paradoxicalmouth

Glimpse of my real self.

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Day 3 - Yearn and Learn

Most of you reading this should at least have a parent they rely on at a certain phase of their life. Some of you reading this might have siblings, perhaps a brother or a sister, older or younger. You grow up with these people for at least one third of your life, but there seem to be something strange about these people that you just can't seem to comprehend. Sometimes you ask yourself this: 'Who are these people?' However, most of the time, you are just too caught up with your life to actually sit down and have a very, and I mean VERY, long and hard thinking session on this perspective of life.

Who is your family? Who are your family members? Who is your father, your mother, your brother, your sister, and most importantly, who is your friend? No, seriously.

Think about it. LOOK VERY CLOSELY. Luke 8: 21.

It's hidden somewhere.

~o0O0o~

To succeed

as a team, it requires much more effort compared to if you're working individually. That's because, the team is only as strong as its weakest link. However, when you do succeed, the feeling of achievement is for profound and exalted compared to an individual victory. We need to be in a committed team because that's the reason we have people around us. That's the reason we aren't alone on this planet Earth.

~o0O0o~

Premise 1: Old women walk to exercise.
Premise 2: I walk to exercise.
Conclusion: I am an old women.

DO YOU SEE ANY LOGICAL DEDUCTION WITH THE ABOVE ARGUMENT? I didn't.

To those people who said running had always been better than walking, try googling 'Walking versus Running' and see what you find.

Walking versus Running.


I tell you, Sherene was laughing at me the whole time I talked about it. And I thought our spiritual leaders should be supportive. Bluek.


4 Comments:

At 11:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Premise 1: Old women walk to exercise.
Premise 2: I walk to exercise.
Conclusion: I am an old women.


Old women = P
Walk to exercise = Q

While P~Q is correct, Q~P is incorrect. Hope you still remember CTS.

 
At 11:54 PM, Blogger chaiminhuei said...

Not incorrect, there is still a possibility that it could be correct. It just states that it is NOT JUSTIFIED as being correct.

No I haven't forgotten my CTS.

May I know who are you?

 
At 12:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, p-Q can be correct in a way, but says who Q-P is incorrect? In a way, it leaves a different answer.

In cts, everything is correct, for subjective judgement is individualistic.

Anonymous2

 
At 2:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i think anonymous is poh sim.

P:

 

Post a Comment

<< Home